Donald Trump will be the next President of the United States. Not because of him being an outsider candidate nor due to Hillary’s high unfavorable numbers. The reason he will win is simple: vision. Hillary Clinton’s campaign slogan “Hillary for America” is probably one of the most empty and uninspiring campaign slogans in recent memory. Thump’s campaign exemplifies optimism while hers exemplifies selfish ambition. This plays directly into voter perception of her, which is that she’s a selfish woman willing to do or say anything to get elected. America does not want Hillary.
Maybe Hillary realizes the whole “Hillary for America” thing won’t work. That’s why she’s come up with a new slogan. Make America whole again — ugh. That message is also a dud with voters, because it’s a spin on Make America Great Again. If we’re not whole, then we’re not great. Hillary misses this point entirely when she speaks about that potential slogan. Hillary Clinton lacks the core political aptitude that her husband does, because I guarentee you, he would’ve never used this slogan that plays right into Donald Trump’s hands.
If Hillary hopes to win, she will have to coordinate a message that is more than just anti-Trump. Voters want an inspiring message they can gravitate to. They crave it at the core of their being, and that’s why Barack Obama did so well in the 2008 Democratic primary. Hillary, back then also spun off of Obama’s slogan which was “Change We Can Believe in” and coined her version, in original form, “Change We Can Count On.” Not at all inspirational, and the slogan had the aroma of Astroturf. Change We Can Count On was viewed as desperate and a counterfeit, and that is exactly what Mrs. Clinton’s entire candidacy is, a counterfeit. She won’t improve the economy, she won’t renegotiate NAFTA, and she sure won’t keep us safe from the Islamic State, who seek to destroy us because we as a nation fundamentally believe in freedom.
Hillary Clinton won’t bring back jobs from China and she won’t stop the currency manipulation that has killed many jobs throughout the rustbelt. She, like her husband, favors “Free Trade” and not fair trade, which translates into You get SCREWED! She, like the Islamic State, believes in forcing government down your throat. She wants to choose your healthcare plan, and she wants to take away your right to homeschool your children in the environment that you see fit. She wants to put us over our heads in debts and deficits beyond what can be repayed.
Beyond that, everything else is on the table in regard to the Clintons’ past. I expect in the coming weeks for Monica Lewinsky Jennifer Flowers, and every other woman both the Clinton’s abused in the 1980s and the 1990s. Donald Trump will use this to his benefit, and unlike many Republicans before him, he won’t be stupid in how he does it. Every time you see a Clinton ad or press conference decrying Donald Trump’s supposed sexism, you’re going to see a counter press conference, a counter press release, a counter ad going on offense talking about the Clinton’s attacks on women. This isn’t just about Bill Clinton, it’s also about Hillary and how she not only “stood by her man baking cookies,” but how she also muffled those women in attacks and vicious intimidation tactics. Hillary has lost any and all credibility on women. She can’t claim to be their savior just because she is one.
There are many women who are highly qualified to be president. And no, Mrs. Clinton, I’m not talking about your lack of political experience. I’m talking about what you’ve actually done when you served time in office. Nothing substantive done as First Lady, when you unsuccessfully tried to shove “HillaryCare” down our throats and force many Americans to buy a service they didn’t want and didn’t choose. Your plan was much more intrusive than the Obamacare plan, which is quite remarkable. Your plan would’ve defined valid personal choices as “healthcare fraud” and punished those who went outside their government proscribed plan. That, my dear, is pure communism. We may or may not have moved slightly to the left as a country, but by no means are we communist. We love our freedom. We’re patriots. We want a government that listens to us, not a government that demands we obey their every thuggish order.
With her disastrous campaign message, her lack of ability to inspire, her lust for power, and her desire for control over every aspect of our lives as well as her lack of ability to cause economic growth by reducing taxes and regulation, she has shown her ineptitude to win elections in the past, and I don’t foresee this changing.
Hillary Clinton is dangerous
Hillary Clinton’s first 100 days in office will be a very tramatic time for America. She would support and expand President Obama’s unconstitutional immigration executive action, while fast tracking naturalization. She will ensure that the eleven million people living in this country illegally can and do stay, passing “comprehensive immigration reform,” known as amnesty. It’s likely that if she were to become president, republicans would lose the senate and have a narrowed majority in the House of Representatives. She will use her electoral mandate to get some Republican support.
Secondly, she will appoint a extreme liberal to the Supreme Court, likely ideologically in tune with Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. They ultimately would overturn the Heller decision, the Hobby lobby decision as well as the decision overturning much of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, they would likely rule against conservatives in the event any state should pass restriction on abortion or Planned Parenthood. We could even see abortion clinics at Walmart, just like we do hair salons. It would be so easy to get an abortion, because the supreme court would find that not only is it a right in the sense that a woman has the option to have one, they would find that a woman has the right to get the RESOURCES for an abortion, which would ultimately come from general revenue funds. To pay for this, democrats would abolish tax-exempt stratus from charities across the board, and instead tax their revenues at the regular rates, which could top 40 percent.
Third, she will move for Cap and trade, and institute a tax on vehicles that the government deems “inefficiant.” This would include millions of vans, buses, SUVs, box trucks, semi trucks, and millions of other vehicles. In other words, unless you drive a Honda Civic hybrid, you’re screwed. Of course, if you work for the government and use your vehicle in the commission of government services, you’ll be exempt from these rules. But hey, I geuss we’re “protecting the environment,” right? Expect this tax to be at least 10 percent of your vehicle’s value, if not more, and if the data shows the tax is ineffective, President Clinton could raise the tax to 15 or 20 percent. You may or may not have the right to contest the value of your vehicle, depending on weather President Clinton puts those provisions in the legislation. But would that be a violation of due process? Nope, not according to Hillary Clinton’s Supreme Court.
Fourth, she’ll be one of the biggest neoconservative presidents we’ve ever seen. She is and has been one of the biggest cheerleaders for regime change, a foreign policy that has never worked out well in the history of the United States, as it didn’t in Egypt or libya, it won’t anywhere else, unless we’re literally prepared to take over their land permanently, which isn’t something neoconservatives favor. She will be more aggressive on foreign policy than George W. Bush, in part because she agrees with the ideology and part due to her not wanting to be perceived as weak by other world leaders. Hilary Clinton will involve the United States in every foreign conflict, arguing its in our “best interest.”
Fifth, she will support the passage of “reasonable gun safety measures” that will infringe our second amendment rights. The first step in this process will be to pass “common sense background checks,” then everything else will fall into place. She will then ask congress to pass the “assault weapons ban,” and then ultimately through a blue state like California enacting a new law, her Supreme Court will find it’s unconstitutional for an individual to keep guns in their homes, and we must surrender them to our local authorities or ultimately face prosecution. She will shut down every gun shop, and outlaw the sale of bullets except to the police and the military. I predict the first offense would be a felony, punishable by no less than five years in prison.
Hillary Clinton would not be a one term president, either. With the millions of voters that will come into the country and the ones living here already being legalized, they will support her in droves because they will have bought into the Democrat’s lie that the Republican Party does not care about them or their well-being. After two terms in the White House, we face the prospect of having a potential 7-2 progressive majority, which would nullify every constitutional right we hold dear. Under Hillary Clinton, we would likely have no hope of another Republican president for at least 20 years, and by then the party would be totally different, something we as conservatives may not even recognise.
It’s up to us to stop her, and I hope you’ll join me in that effort.
Dear voters, I know you all have individual opinions about who should be nominated. Right now, we have only one real choice: We must nominate Donald J. Trump for the presidency. This is a moral imperative if nothing else. Ted Cruz has run an honorable campaign, he has spoken about the conservative agenda in ways that have excited many voters, however he lacks the mandate from the electorate. More states have gone to Trump (21) than Cruz (11) and weather or not he won a majority in any of these states is a mute point because NO one won a majority in any state, with the possible exception of Ted Cruz in a few small caucus states.
Trump has also won more popular votes than any other candidate, and voters believe their voices should be heard. The arguement that Trump has only received 37 percent of the vote and therefore everyone else was voting against him doesn’t fly either, because in any of these states the Kasich, Rubio, Bush, Carson, Christie, and Fiorina votes didn’t go to Cruz either. None of these candidates have won a “majority”. It’s almost impossible for any candidate to win a majority of the delegates in a field of 17 candidates. The standard isn’t fair, and voters agree, according to a new NBC News poll, over 60 percent of voters believe the person who has won the most votes going into a convention should be nominated. That’s because most voters believe in a democracy, weather we live in a constitutional republic or not. Voters want their voices heard. That’s probably why 45 percent of voters in this same poll believe it would be acceptable for Trump to run as a third party, as 47 percent do not. If we potentially lose 45 percent of our party, it could be fatal. When perception is matched against the “rules,” the perception will always defeat the “rules.”
But what about the delegates? Don’t they decide the nominee? Technically, yes, they do and they have for many many years. But in the age of the 24/7 media and the primary and caucus system influencing perception, its difficult politically not to give the nomination to someone who has won more votes, more states and more delegates. I’ve heard many Cruz supporters argue that it’s entirely up to the delegates, and they are 100 percent correct. It’s also up to voters in November, and if they choose not to turn out for our nominee, we will lose to Hillary Clinton. We cannot allow the perception of a rigged political process to take hold. In today’s America, voters demand their say, weather they technically have a right to it or not.
Where do we go from here? That’s a good question. I think we must put our emotions aside and focus on what’s really important here, as I discussed in my previous article. The #NeverTrump crowd needs to think about what they have fought for over the last several decades AND what they fought against. Most conservatives didn’t fight against Donald Trump in the 90s, but they did fight the Clintons. They fought Hillary when she tried to install universal healthcare, they fought for justice when agents were fired from the travel office. They fought against the Clintons when Bill Clinton vetoed welfare reform, until he signed it. I don’t remember a lot of conservatives fighting against Donald Trump in the 90s, because Donald Trump said at the 1988 convention that he was a Republican… that’s right…all the way back to 1988.
Ted Cruz is a smart man, with a great political future. As Donald Trump’s vice president he would be in good position to run in the year 2024, after serving two consecutive terms as Trump’s right hand man. As a original voter for Ted Cruz, having lived in Texas in 2012 and voted for him in both the primary and general elections, I know Ted Cruz is a man of integrity, and I look forward to him supporting this party and becoming president in the future.
I will never vote for Hillary Clinton
There is one easy factor about casting my vote in the presidential election this year, and that is under no circumstances will I even think about voting for Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama’s Secretary of State who was replaced with the stupidest man in American politics, John Kerry. Hillary Clinton is profoundly unqualified to be president, and if she was the only American left qualified to be president, we would be better off without a president.
Hillary Clinton’s supporters extol her experience as the strongest point in their case for making her president, because she has little other claim to the presidency. But what is her experience that would make her qualified to be president. Her experience is presiding over big government and personally being involved with some of the most corrupt things done under both the Clinton and Obama administrations. Her experience is one of abusing government power, for personal gain, over the interests of citizens.
Let’s start first in the days of the Bill Clinton presidency and what came to be known as the “Travel-gate” scandal. In May of 1993, right around the time that Hillary’s hand-picked Attorney General Janet Reno was overseeing the gas and fry of 76 citizens including many children at Waco, Texas, Hillary oversaw the firing of the seven non-partisan civil service employees at the White House Travel Office so friends of Bill and Hillary, who owned a travel agency, could get the business instead. The Clintons abused the courts, the FBI, and the IRS to ruin the lives of those seven employees to give the business to their cronies instead. The case went to court, and seven employees are exonerated of all charges, and the judge condemned the prosecutor for bringing charges against them. But it was too late, the Clintons had ruined them for the person gain of their friends.
The e-mail-gate scandal, where Hillary received and sent official government e-mails, including many that were classified and top-secret, on a poorly secured private server that was allegedly physically located in the public bathroom of a convenience store, shows how little regard Hillary had for the security of government communications and properly doing her job as Secretary of State. This behavior is likely criminal, and other public officials have gone to prison for doing far less. If Hillary can’t competently handle official and top-secret communications, she’s not qualified to be responsible for all that a president has to be responsible for. That is clear, e-mail-gate is quite serious and shows Hillary is not qualified to perform the most basic functions of a president.
The alleged corruption, influence-peddling, and pockets being stuffed with money in the Clinton Foundation might yet turn out to be the largest and most serious of the Clinton scandals that might come to light later on this year. If the allegations are to be believed or turn out to be substantiated, the Clinton Foundation has been a cesspool of corruption unlike any known before it. This could complete disqualify Hillary later this year from the presidential race.
While it remains unsettled who the Republican nominee for this Fall will be, I will not be voting for Hillary Clinton. There is no scenario nor any circumstances under which I will vote for Hillary Clinton. It’s not happening.